Skip to content
Scienshell
About 20 min read

Yin and Yang: A Muon Collider Around Iapetus

A hard-science-fiction engineering exercise: from the energy limits of colliders to muons, time dilation and synchrotron radiation, ending with a ring accelerator on the equatorial ridge of Saturn's two-faced moon.

Iapetus with a collider ring on its equatorial ridge, the height of the decay-neutrino line above the surface, and the ridge cross-section.

Schematic globe not to scale; panel b is calculated for R = 746 km and a 13 km ridge.

A century ago, humanity's most powerful collider, the LHC, reached a centre-of-mass energy of 13.6 TeV. (This article is written from the point of view of the Out of the Cradle setting, some generations from now.) To see deeper into matter you need more energy. To get more energy you need a bigger ring, stronger magnets and a better particle to accelerate. Following those three lines to their end leads to an icy moon of Saturn with one black face and one white one.

Method: three kinds of basis

  • Established physics (not negotiable): relativistic kinematics, synchrotron radiation, the muon lifetime, the de Broglie wavelength and magnetic pressure.
  • Design studies by the physics community (adopted for the setting): ionisation cooling of muons, high-field solenoids and the neutrino radiation problem of muon colliders. These are marked "design study".
  • Engineering extrapolation (setting): metastable metallic hydrogen magnets, carbon-nanotube exoskeletons and a ring facility on the equator of Iapetus. These are marked "setting".

The main findings

The muon is the best particle to collide. It is elementary, so all of its energy goes into the collision. At the same energy it emits about 1.8 billion times less synchrotron radiation than an electron, and its rate for producing a Higgs boson directly (in the s-channel) is about 43,000 times the electron's.

The energy ceiling is set by synchrotron radiation, not by the magnets. On a ring of about 4,770 km around Iapetus, a muon beam of 9.4 PeV would radiate about 88 times its own energy on every turn. The practical ceiling is about 1 PeV per beam.

Design point: 0.94 PeV per beam, a muon centre-of-mass energy of 1.88 PeV. Using the rule of thumb that a muon collider matches a proton collider of up to about 10 times its energy, this is equivalent to a proton collider of about 18.8 PeV, the figure used in the setting.

Time dilation keeps the muons alive. The Lorentz factor is about 8.9 million, which stretches the muon's 2.2 μs lifetime to about 19.5 s in the laboratory. In that time a muon goes round the ring about 1,230 times, enough for one collider store.

The 50 T magnets go where they matter most: the final stage of ionisation cooling and the focusing at the collision points. The main ring needs only about 7 T, and in Iapetus's 90–130 K environment the metallic hydrogen magnets need no refrigeration at all.

The neutrinos never reach the ground. With the ring on top of a ridge about 13 km high, every tangent to the beam passes farther from the moon's centre than the surface does.

Table 1. Collider baseline (setting)

ParameterValueBasis
NameIMC, the Iapetus Muon ColliderSetting
Circumference / locationAbout 4,770 km, along the top of the equatorial ridge (ring radius about 759 km)Setting; radius from Iapetus's 746 km equatorial radius plus 13 km
Energy per beam / muon centre-of-mass energy0.94 PeV / 1.88 PeVCalculation
Equivalent proton-collider energyAbout 18.8 PeVCalculation (muon discovery reach taken as about 10 times)
Main-ring dipole fieldAbout 7 T (dipoles fill about 60% of the ring)Calculation
Cooling and focusing magnets50 T class metallic hydrogen solenoids and quadrupolesSetting
Lorentz factor / laboratory lifetime8.9×10⁶ / about 19.5 sCalculation
Synchrotron loss per turnAbout 9% of the beam energy (about 83 TeV)Calculation
Total powerAbout 60 GWSetting

1. Seeing smaller takes more energy

A particle collider is a microscope. The smallest scale it can resolve is set by the reduced de Broglie wavelength that corresponds to the collision energy:

$$\lambda\approx\frac{\hbar c}{E}=\frac{1.97\times10^{-16}\,\mathrm{GeV\cdot m}}{E}$$

Table 2. Humanity's colliders

ColliderCircumferenceCentre-of-mass energyMain goals
BEPC II (Beijing)240 mAbout 2–5 GeVTau leptons and charm quarks
SuperKEKB (Japan)3.0 km10.6 GeVCP violation; built for luminosity, not energy
RHIC (USA)3.8 km200 GeV per nucleon pair (gold–gold)Quark–gluon plasma
SPS (Europe)6.9 km540–630 GeV (as a proton–antiproton collider, 1981–1991)W and Z bosons; later the LHC's injector
LHC (Europe)26.7 km13.6 TeVThe Higgs boson; probes about 10⁻¹⁹ m

The LHC's resolution is quoted for the parton collisions that actually occur, which carry roughly a tenth of the proton–proton energy.

The energy of a circular accelerator is set jointly by its magnetic field and its bending radius:

$$E\,[\mathrm{GeV}]=0.3\,B\,[\mathrm{T}]\,\rho\,[\mathrm{m}]$$

Magnets have a material limit, so higher energy means a bigger ring. With the LHC's 8.3 T magnets, protons and the LHC's ratio of circumference to bending radius, a proton collider of about 18.8 PeV would need a ring about 36,000 km round, close to the length of Earth's equator. For 188 PeV it would need about 360,000 km, close to the distance from Earth to the Moon. That road soon runs out.

2. The proton is a sack

The proton is not an elementary particle. It is a "sack" of three valence quarks plus a great many gluons and sea quarks. When two protons collide at 14 TeV, the energy is shared among all the partons in the sack. The hard collision usually involves just one pair of them, carrying a small fraction of the total; the rest of the debris sprays out as an enormous background.

With a particle that has no internal structure, all the energy goes into the collision. Theoretical studies find that a muon collider has roughly the discovery reach of a proton collider at 7–10 times its centre-of-mass energy: a 14 TeV muon collider is roughly equivalent to a 100–140 TeV proton collider.

3. Electrons "scream", muons do not

The most familiar elementary particle is the electron, but a charged particle radiates energy whenever its path bends. The synchrotron loss per turn is:

$$U_{0}=\frac{C_{\gamma}E^{4}}{\rho}\left(\frac{m_{e}}{m}\right)^{4},\qquad C_{\gamma}=8.85\times10^{-5}\,\mathrm{m\cdot GeV^{-3}}$$

At a given energy the loss falls as the fourth power of the mass. The muon is 207 times heavier than the electron.

Table 3. Three particles compared (same beam energy)

ParticleElementary?Synchrotron lossHiggs coupling / direct Higgs production
ElectronYes11 / 1
MuonYesAbout 1/1.8 billion of the electron'sAbout 207 times (∝ m) / about 43,000 times (∝ m²)
ProtonNo (a sack)About 10⁻¹³ of the electron's—

In a tunnel the size of the LHC's, electrons stop gaining energy at about 0.1–0.2 TeV per beam; that is where LEP ended. The muon combines the "cleanness" of the electron with the "steadiness" of the proton. Its only problem is its lifetime.

4. Time dilation: speed as an elixir of life

At rest a muon lives only 2.2 μs. Even at the speed of light it would travel only about 660 m. But for a fast-moving muon, time runs slow:

$$\gamma=\frac{E}{mc^{2}},\qquad\tau_{lab}=\gamma\tau_{0}$$

At the design point of 0.94 PeV per beam:

$$\gamma=\frac{9.4\times10^{5}\,\mathrm{GeV}}{0.1057\,\mathrm{GeV}}\approx8.9\times10^{6},\qquad\tau_{lab}\approx8.9\times10^{6}\times2.2\,\mu\mathrm{s}\approx19.5\,\mathrm{s}$$

Table 4. The life of a muon in the ring

ItemValue
Rate at which time passesAbout 8.9 million times slower than in the laboratory
Lifetime in the laboratoryAbout 19.5 s
Distance travelled in one lifetimeAbout 5.9 million km (about 15 times the Earth–Moon distance)
Turns around the Iapetus ringAbout 1,230
One laboratory year, for the muonAbout 3.5 s

"Lifetime" is the mean lifetime: after this time about 37% of the muons remain.

Around a thousand turns is typical of the storage times in muon collider design studies. Before they decay, the muons have time to cross each other at the collision points over a thousand times.

5. The ring's energy ceiling: synchrotron radiation

The muon's synchrotron radiation is small, but it grows as the fourth power of energy. On the Iapetus equatorial ring the dipoles bend the beam with a radius of about 455 km (60% of the ring radius), and the loss per turn as a fraction of the beam energy is:

$$\frac{U_{0}}{E}=\frac{C_{\gamma}}{\rho}\left(\frac{m_{e}}{m_{\mu}}\right)^{4}E^{3}$$
Synchrotron loss per turn of a muon beam on the Iapetus ring versus beam energy, versus dipole field at 0.94 PeV, and the RF gradient needed to replace it.

Figure 1. Synchrotron loss on the Iapetus ring (calculated). a, Loss per turn as a fraction of beam energy for muons with a bending radius of about 455 km (dipoles fill 60% of the 759 km radius ring; band shows ±15% in bending radius). The fractional loss grows as the cube of energy: about 9% (about 83 TeV) per turn at the 0.94 PeV design point, 100% at about 2.1 PeV and about 88 times the beam energy at 9.4 PeV. b, Loss per turn at 0.94 PeV as a function of dipole field: a stronger field shortens the bending radius and raises the loss, so about 7 T is the natural choice. c, Ring budget (60% dipoles, 40% RF) and the average RF gradient needed to restore the loss, about 44 MV/m at the design point.

The absolute loss grows as the fourth power of energy, so the fractional loss grows as the cube. At 0.94 PeV per beam the loss is about 9% per turn. At about 2.1 PeV a beam would radiate its whole energy in one turn. At 9.4 PeV, the beam energy a proton-style design would need to reach 18.8 PeV directly, the loss per turn would be about 88 times the beam energy. On the scale of this moon, about 1 PeV per beam is therefore the practical ceiling for a circular muon collider, however strong the magnets are. At a given energy a stronger field only makes the bending radius smaller and the loss larger.

The design point is therefore 0.94 PeV per beam, a muon centre-of-mass energy of 1.88 PeV. By the conversion in Section 2, its discovery reach matches a proton collider of about 18.8 PeV, about 1,400 times the LHC's energy. The main ring needs a field of only:

$$B=\frac{E}{0.3\rho}=\frac{9.4\times10^{5}}{0.3\times4.55\times10^{5}}\approx7\,\mathrm{T}$$

That is comparable to the LHC's 8.3 T. The 83 TeV lost per turn is restored by RF cavities spread over about 40% of the ring, with an average accelerating gradient of about 44 MV/m. That is at the upper end of what twenty-first-century superconducting RF cavities demonstrated. With 60% of the ring in dipoles and 40% in RF, the budget leaves no room for focusing magnets, collision halls or injection; a real lattice would need some margin, for example slightly stronger dipoles over a shorter length.

6. Choosing the site: Iapetus

A ring of about 4,770 km needs a foundation that is large enough and quiet enough.

Table 5. Iapetus: basic parameters (measurement)

ParameterValueEngineering meaning
Mean radius / equatorial radius734.5 km / about 746 km (the moon is oblate, polar radius about 712 km)Sets the scale of the ring
Equatorial circumferenceAbout 4,690 kmSets the scale of the ring
Mean density1.088 g/cm³Mostly ice
Surface gravity / escape speed0.223 m/s² (0.023 g) / 573 m/sLight structures, cheap landings and launches
Orbital radius3.56 million km (about 59 Saturn radii)Far from Saturn and the other large moons
Orbital inclinationAbout 15.5° to Saturn's equatorial planeFar above and outside the main rings
Rotation79.3 days, tidally lockedAlmost no tidal flexing
Surface temperatureDark side about 130 K, bright side about 100 K at midday; below 90 K at nightIdeal for superconductors without cooling
AtmosphereNoneNo wind loads, no corrosion

A collider needs two beams to meet with nanometre precision after travelling thousands of kilometres, and any deformation means realignment. Iapetus is far from Saturn, so the tides raised on it are tiny, and it is geologically dead: no plates, no volcanoes, no known subsurface ocean. Once the magnets are aligned, they can stay aligned for years.

Layout of the Iapetus ring seen from above the north pole, an unrolled map of temperature, pipe finish, ridge support, magnet lattice and joints, and a profile of a transition zone.

Figure 2. Layout of the equatorial ring (schematic, setting). a, View from above the north pole: the ring runs over the dark leading hemisphere (Cassini Regio) and the bright trailing terrain, with its pipe painted the opposite colour to the ground beneath it; bands show the ridge support, pipe finish and the dipole and RF sections (ring bands drawn about 10 times wider than the true 13 km offset). b, The ring unrolled along the equator: midday temperature (about 130 K on the dark side, about 100 K on the bright side, below 90 K at night), surface albedo, pipe finish, support (continuous ridge of about 1,300 km, isolated peaks and trusses elsewhere), a schematic 60/40 dipole and RF pattern, collision points (positions schematic) and expansion joints. c, Profile through an Ash Coast transition zone: the silver pipe lies on the continuous ridge crest, the black pipe crosses gaps between isolated peaks on trusses, with an expansion joint about every kilometre and the largest bellows joint at the transition.

7. The equatorial ridge: a natural foundation and a radiation exit

Iapetus has a unique ridge along its equator, up to about 13 km high and about 20 km wide. It runs continuously for about 1,300 km across the dark side and breaks up into isolated peaks on the bright side. The crest is fairly smooth, and the mixture of ice and rock is as hard as stone at 100 K. It is a natural elevated base. The ring is laid directly on the ridge where it is continuous and carried on trusses across the gaps, so that the whole ring stays at a radius of about 759 km (setting).

The ridge also solves the most awkward safety problem of a muon collider. Muon decays produce high-energy neutrinos that leave along the tangent to the beam. On Earth such a beam comes back out of the ground far away, where it delivers a radiation dose. On Iapetus the ring sits at a radius R + h above the centre, and any tangent to it stays at least R + h from the centre:

$$d(s)=\sqrt{(R+h)^{2}+s^{2}}\geq R+h>R$$

The tangent never touches the ground. Once it leaves the beam pipe, the neutrino beam only climbs. 50 km away it is already about 1.6 km above the ridge crest and about 15 km above the surrounding plain. The control centre and living quarters at the foot of the ridge need no extra neutrino shielding. This holds as long as the beam direction never departs from the local circumferential direction by more than about 10°, which is easily met by a ring made of many short arcs and straight sections.

8. Yin and yang: a superconducting ring that needs no cooling

The leading hemisphere of Iapetus, Cassini Regio, has an albedo of only 0.03–0.05, darker than coal. The trailing hemisphere (Roncevaux Terra in the north and Saragossa Terra in the south) has an albedo of about 0.5–0.6, like dirty snow. Spacecraft observations have explained the contrast: dark dust from Saturn's outer Phoebe ring falls on the leading face; the darkened ice absorbs more sunlight and sublimates, and the water vapour freezes again on the brighter, colder areas. The dark gets darker and the bright gets brighter.

Both faces are cold: about 130 K at midday on the dark side and about 100 K on the bright side. The metastable metallic hydrogen alloy described in Metal from Beyond has a critical temperature of 400 K in the setting, so magnets here need no refrigeration at all. Even at 130 K the alloy keeps most of its 200 T upper critical field. The cooling system, a major item in both the cost and the power budget of today's colliders, disappears.

Table 6. Treating the dark and bright faces (setting)

RegionAlbedoTemperaturePipe finishPurpose
Dark side (Cassini Regio)0.03–0.05About 130 KBright reflective silverVisible in the dark; avoids spacecraft collisions
Bright side (Roncevaux Terra)0.5–0.6About 100 KDeep blackAbsorbs heat; reduces the temperature difference between the two halves
Transition zone (the "Ash Coast", a setting name)MottledIn between—Expansion joints

A temperature difference of about 30 K between the two halves, plus the day–night swing, makes the pipe expand and contract. Metals at 100–130 K have expansion coefficients of roughly 0.5–1×10⁻⁵ per kelvin, so half the ring (about 2,400 km) changes length by several hundred metres. Expansion joints are therefore not only placed in the two transition zones. One joint is placed about every kilometre around the ring, each taking up about 0.3–0.4 m, and the largest, bellows-style joints sit in the transition zones.

9. The 50 T magnets: used where they matter most

The main ring needs only about 7 T, but a muon collider has two places that need very strong fields. The first is ionisation cooling. Muons are made by firing protons into a target and are born as a diffuse, "hot" cloud that has to be compressed within a few microseconds, before most of them decay. Design studies find that the final cooling stage needs solenoids of 30–50 T; the stronger the field, the smaller the beam can be squeezed. The second is the final focus at the collision points: the stronger the quadrupoles, the smaller the beam spot where the beams cross, and the higher the collision rate.

A 50 T magnet faces three limits. The structural one comes from magnetic pressure:

$$P_{mag}=\frac{B^{2}}{2\mu_{0}}=\frac{50^{2}}{2\times4\pi\times10^{-7}}\approx1\,\mathrm{GPa}$$

Table 7. Three limits of a 50 T magnet and the responses

LimitProblemResponseBasis
MaterialREBCO tape at 50 T is needed in huge quantities, and it needs coolingMetastable metallic hydrogen alloy: no cooling, 200 T upper critical fieldSetting (see Metal from Beyond)
Structure1 GPa of magnetic pressure is about 3–4 times the yield strength of ordinary structural steelCarbon-nanotube or diamond exoskeleton; canted cos-theta (CCT) windings turn the forces into hoop stressSetting
QuenchStored energy released in one place can burn out the magnetNo-insulation (NI) coils: current bypasses the quenched spot by itselfDemonstrated in twenty-first-century high-field magnets

10. Energy budget

The facility's total power is about 60 GW (setting), most of it to make up for synchrotron radiation. Taking the whole 60 GW as an upper bound on the radiated power and averaging around the ring:

$$q=\frac{P}{2\pi R}=\frac{6\times10^{10}\,\mathrm{W}}{4.77\times10^{6}\,\mathrm{m}}\approx13\,\mathrm{kW/m}$$

The radiation is emitted only in the dipoles, so along the dipoles the heat load is about 21 kW/m. It lands on absorbers along the pipe wall. The critical energy of the radiated photons is about 0.5 GeV, which puts them in the gamma-ray range; they need heavy-metal absorbers such as tungsten.

With the absorbers running at about 600 K, a black radiator sheds about 7.3 kW per square metre into Iapetus's black sky. Each metre of ring then needs about 2 m² of radiator on average, or about 3 m² per metre along the dipoles.

The power figure implies a beam. With 83 TeV lost per muon per turn and a revolution frequency of about 63 Hz, 60 GW of radiation corresponds to about 3.6×10¹³ muons in each beam; if only half the power reaches the beam, about 1.8×10¹³. That is about ten times the muons per bunch assumed in today's 10 TeV muon collider studies. The beam intensity is part of the setting, not a calculated result.

11. Seeing inside the quark

A muon collider at 1.88 PeV puts its full energy into each collision and probes a scale of about 10⁻²² m. That is about three orders of magnitude finer than the LHC, whose parton collisions reach about 10⁻¹⁹ m. At this scale a proton no longer looks like a small ball. It looks like an empty universe.

Table 8. Levels of matter and where the collider sits

Era / machineEnergyScale (ħc/E)Target
Atoms and molecules (around 1900)eV–keV10⁻⁷–10⁻¹⁰ mAtoms and chemical bonds
Nuclei (early twentieth century)MeV–100 MeV10⁻¹³–10⁻¹⁵ mProtons, neutrons and the nuclear force
Hadrons (mid-twentieth century)1–10 GeV10⁻¹⁶–10⁻¹⁷ mQuarks and the strong interaction
LHC13.6 TeV (partons about 1–2 TeV)About 10⁻¹⁹ mThe Higgs boson; completing the Standard Model
FCC-hh (proposed in the twenty-first century)100 TeV (partons about 10 TeV)About 10⁻²⁰ mHiggs self-coupling, dark-matter candidates
IMC (Iapetus)1.88 PeV muons (equivalent to about 18.8 PeV protons)About 10⁻²² mSub-quark structure: preons and hypercolour
Highest-energy cosmic raysAbout 0.4–0.8 PeV (centre of mass, 10²⁰ eV proton on a nucleon at rest)About 3–5×10⁻²² mThe upper limit of nature's accelerators
Grand unification scaleAbout 10¹³ TeVAbout 10⁻³² mUnification of the forces; reachable only by theory
Planck scaleAbout 10¹⁶ TeVAbout 10⁻³⁵ mQuantum gravity; spacetime no longer continuous

If quarks and leptons are made of smaller "preons" (as in the rishon model), the "hypercolour" force that binds them would begin to show at this scale. The angular distribution of collision products would depart from what point particles give, or excited states of quarks and leptons would appear. This is the entrance to the "great desert": beyond the Standard Model there may be nothing, or there may be the next layer of matter.

In the setting, at full power, the beam's interactions with residual gas send faint light out along the tangents of the equatorial ridge. Seen from space, the moon seems to be firing lasers into deep space, while the neutrino beams leave quietly along the same tangents.

12. Main failure modes

Table 9. Failures and responses

FailureTriggerConsequenceDesign response
Beam lossMagnet fault or misalignmentHigh-energy muons strike the pipe wallFast extraction of the beam to a dedicated absorber
Magnet quenchLocal overheating or micrometeoroid impactField collapsesSelf-protecting NI coils; sectioned power supply
Thermal stressTemperature difference between dark and bright sides; day–night cyclePipe misalignmentDistributed expansion joints; online alignment
MicrometeoroidsInterplanetary and Phoebe-ring dustPunctured pipe wall, loss of vacuumShields; sectioned vacuum valves
Radiated heatSynchrotron gamma raysAbsorbers overheatHeavy-metal absorbers and radiative cooling
Neutrino radiationMuon decayRadiation dose far awayTangents never touch the ground; straight sections point into deep space

This accelerator makes no roar. There are only particles running along the ridge at the speed of light. It turns a black-and-white moon into a yin-yang symbol, and it brings humanity to the door of the next layer of matter.

References and calculation basis

  • CERN, LHC technical parameters: circumference 26.7 km, dipole field 8.3 T, bending radius 2,804 m, centre-of-mass energy 13.6 TeV.
  • International Muon Collider Collaboration (2024), Interim Report for the International Muon Collider Design Study: the muon/proton discovery-reach conversion, high-field solenoids for ionisation cooling, neutrino radiation.
  • Delahaye et al. (2019), Muon Colliders, arXiv:1901.06150: overview of the physics and technology of muon colliders.
  • H. Wiedemann, Particle Accelerator Physics: synchrotron loss formula, the constant $C_{\gamma}$ and the critical photon energy.
  • NASA, Iapetus; Porco et al. (2005), Science 307; Thomas (2010), Icarus 208: Iapetus's parameters and shape, the equatorial ridge and the two-tone surface.
  • Spencer and Denk (2010), Science 327: thermal segregation of ice as the mechanism behind the two-tone surface.
  • Hahn et al. (2011), No-insulation coil technique, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity: no-insulation high-temperature superconducting coils.
  • Calculation basis: ring radius about 759 km (equatorial radius about 746 km plus a 13 km ridge); dipoles fill about 60% of the ring, giving a bending radius of about 455 km; muon mass 0.1057 GeV; rest lifetime 2.197 μs; Iapetus GM = 120.5 km³/s².

Appendix A. Principal symbols

Table 10. Symbols

SymbolMeaningSymbolMeaning
EBeam energyρBending radius
BDipole field$U_{0}$Synchrotron loss per turn
γLorentz factor$C_{\gamma}$Synchrotron radiation constant
$\tau_{0}$ / $\tau_{lab}$Rest lifetime / laboratory lifetimeλReduced de Broglie wavelength
R / hMoon radius / ridge height$P_{mag}$Magnetic pressure

← Back to BlogBack to top ↑